“Touch my prick and I’ll tell my dad and he
will kill you,” the nauseating child is reputed to have said for all to hear,
but I can’t help wondering how many pricks daddy might have touched in his
lifetime. Yes, I’m back on the subject I swore I would never write about again.
Why then, you ask, am I back with it? Well, the answer is quite simple, it is
back with me. I can’t open a newspaper or download the news but there is more
often or not a gay article. There are the boys in Iraq who are perceived to be gay
and in consequence murdered; the so-called Emo killings. The creation of a
group to campaign for gay rights in Liberia has led to a fierce backlash - a
house rented by the mother of a campaigner has been burnt down and even the
president - last year's Nobel Peace Prize winner - has waded in to say she will
never support laws recognising homosexual rights and the campaigners have had
to seek police protection from the
mob. A Ugandan cabinet minister has raided a workshop for gay activists and tried
to arrest the organizer, a Ugandan paper and UK-based rights group have said. ‘Minister
for Ethics and Integrity’(!) Simon Lokodo said the gathering was
"illegal" and ordered delegates out of the hotel near the capital. It
comes days after an MP retabled a controversial anti-gay bill. It proposes
increasing the penalties in Uganda
for homosexual acts, which are illegal, from
14 years in jail to life which, considering the amount of homosexuality that
takes place in prison, is totally ridiculous if only they could take the
blinkers off and see it. David Bahati, the MP behind the proposed legislation,
says a clause proposing the death penalty will be dropped. It originally said
those found guilty of "aggravated homosexuality" - defined as when
one of the participants is a minor, HIV-positive, disabled(!) or a "serial
offender" - would face the death penalty. I haven’t had any news recently
of the proposed St. Petersburg bill putting a silencer on any mention of the subject
but occasionally, only occasionally, you do get something positive like a group
of leading Anglicans saying the Church of England has "nothing to
fear" from the prospect of gay
marriage and it should be a cause for
rejoicing. In a letter to The Times prominent figures including five former
bishops say statements by church leaders give a false impression of popular
feeling. "We believe the Church has nothing to fear from
civil marriage for same-sex couples," it says, and now Obama has come off the
fence and endorsed same-sex marriage. But now we come to the latest from America – Dominic Dieter, a bigheaded DJ with a
popular rock station in Cleveland, Ohio advised a listener, who found his
daughter kissing another girl, that he should get one of his friends to “screw
her straight.” Think of the message that sends out. Huge headlines – ‘Gay
Romney spokesman resigns amid conservative backlash.’ Richard Grenell previously
worked as a spokesman for the UN mission under President George W. Bush. An openly gay spokesman for presidential
candidate Mitt Romney he quit on his first official day of work amid criticism by
anti-gay conservatives. Bryan Fischer, director of “issues analysis for the
American Family Association,” a group opposed to homosexuality, wrote a Blog
posted on 20 April attacking Mr. Romney's choice, saying it sent a
"message to the pro-family community: drop dead". Did it really? Well
let us for a moment discuss the family. Where do they believe gays come from? Do they drop from
trees? Do they sprout up out of the ground? No, for goodness sake, they are created
by heterosexual couplings, they are born out of heterosexual marriages, they
are, or were, themselves members of families, even American mom’s apple-pie
family, even Ugandan and Liberian families. If you want to eradicate gays then
stop having sex and breeding, that is the only way: sons, daughters, cousins,
uncles, aunts, even fathers and mothers can be included as having some gay
experience, even if only emotionally, which brings me back to why I ask how
many pricks may that child’s father have touched?
An opinion in Gay Community News in 1980 by John Lauretsen reads - Human males are
powerfully attracted to other males – erotically and emotionally. This
attraction is not the product of peculiar life experiences of any sort, nor of
hormonal imbalance, nor of genetic aberrations, nor of any other such
etiological foolishness. The male capacity to love another male is inborn, a
phylogenetic characteristic of our species. If a man has any libido at all – he
is not a total eunuch – his libido has a homosexual element. Homosexual desire
is universal. A gay man recognises this desire; a straight man consciously or
unconsciously does not.
Finally here is a scenario for members of
the American Family Association to mull over: a same sex couple adopt a child,
protect and nurture it with all the love, consideration, and respect it
deserves as a human being. A straight couple neglect their child, deprive it of
love, abuse it, and in some instances actually kill it (Baby Peter for
example). Which child reaps the most benefit? Which child has the better start in
life, the better family? I really do not believe the answer can be in any doubt
except possibly by the American Family Association and others of a similar
blinkered, ignorant, fearful state of mind.
1 comment:
John Lauritsen's (sic)website is well worth reading for all sorts of interesting information on various sub jects. He has his own publishing company, Pagan Press.
Post a Comment